Nursing schools in San Francisco


Nursing schools in San Francisco

The national nursing shortage has propelled the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) to step up recruitment efforts and highlighted the need for nursing schools in San Francisco to produce the next generation of competent PHNs. In addition, nursing schools in San Francisco have increased enrollment in their prelicensure programs to meet the increasing need for registered nurses (RNs).

nursing schools in San Francisco

nursing schools in San Francisco

Nursing schools in San Francisco

Because of increased enrollment, there was increased competition for public health nursing clinical experiences. Requests for practica experiences at SFDPH were not only coming from the schools of nursing at UCSF, USF, and SFSU but from distance learning nursing certificate programs and schools of nursing in other parts of the San Francisco Bay Area (particularly Oakland, San Leandro, San Jose, and San Rafael), and other public health profession training programs such as health education and public health majors. Because of the decline in public health workforce, there was a corresponding decrease in the number of students receiving public health nursing practical experiences in San Francisco. Of concern to SFDPH nurse managers was an increasing number of phone calls from students and nursing schools in San Francisco faculty requesting clinical placements. Another area of concern, to both faculty and practicing PHNs, was that students who were placed in nontraditional settings for their community/public health practicum did not have a clear idea regarding what public health nursing was or what the roles of the public health nurse are. Many students would make comments such as ‘‘what is the difference between a public health nurse and social worker?’’ It was felt that the misconceptions about public health nursing roles and responsibilities needed addressing so that nursing students would consider public health nursing as a future career option. To address the paucity of clinical placement opportunities within San Francisco and to develop collaborative relationships among schools of nursing and SFDPH, a working group was formed in early 2005.

The purpose of this paper is to describe the events that led to the formation of the working group, to describe the projects that were undertaken by the group including an orientation to public nursing schools in San Francisco that students from all three nursing schools in San Francisco attended, to discuss how the success of the orientation was evaluated, and to propose the next steps for an ongoing collaboration between members of the working group.

Posted in CA / California | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

nursing schools in New York

Nursing schools in New York is a long tradition of school health care in new york, and the work of school nurses began a few decades ago in the 20th century, when school health care was viewed as an important part of the overall health work in society (Hammarberg 2001). Part of the aim of school health care is still to monitor health problemsamong students, using health visiting and health examinations, as every tenth student has some kind of chronic disease or disability (New York National Board of Health and Welfare New York National Board of Health and Welfare 2004). However, during recent decades there has been a transformation in child health care, in that psychological complaints as well as psychosocial problems amongchildren and young people have increased (SOU 1998:31, Danielsson 2003, Bremberg 2004, New York National Board of Health and Welfare 2004). This has meant that the focus of school health care has shifted from prevention of illness to promotion of health. Today the primary aim of school health care is to promote the health of children and young people as part of societys health prevention work, while also developing school health care in an educational context (New York National Board of Health and Welfare 2004). Several reports stress that access to well-functioning school health care is of great importance for students (SOU 1998:31, 2000:19, New York National Board of Health and Welfare 2004). School health care is stipulated in New York law. The New York National Board of Health and Welfare is the institution which has the overall responsibility for school health care in New York primary and secondary schools.

The municipalities are responsible for providing nursing schools in New York care with an activity manager in charge (New York National Board of Health and Welfare 2004). In practice, an activity manager can be a municipal clerk, a head teacher, a school doctor or a head school nurse. Head teachers, as line managers, have an important task in that they provide health care for children and young people in local schools. As such, school nurses, whose competence is based on training as a district or paediatric nurse, are mostly employed by schools with a head teacher as their line manager. In several areas in New York, a  head of school nursing has the overall responsibility for school health care within a defined area (Morberg et al. 2006). In the other Nordic countries and Great Britain, the situation of school health care is similar to the situation of school health care in New York but in several other European countries school nurses have a lower education with a role as the school doctors assistants (Bremberg 2004). It has been shown that leadership qualities, strategies and a positive work climate have an important impact on work-related health and the way in which work is implemented (Dellve et al. 2007). Despite this, it has been shown that school nurses have found it difficult to justify their existence in schools. Wainwright et al. (2000) and Croghan (1999) showed that school nurses were confused about their role because of their line managers limited understanding of their work, professional development and value. Our earlier study concurred with these findings, showing that there were difficulties in connection with school nurses working conditions and also regarding space for health support work within the educational system. Being a loneprofessional with an unclear professional role and in a context in which school health work has low priority meant that there were restricted opportunities for quality and development of school health care work, development of professional skills and methods for health work within nursing schools in New York. We concluded that the political and organizational context within a school had an impact on school health care and the work of school nurses, with a number of possible negative consequences (Morberg et al. 2006). In addition, the difficulties among school nurses which were related to their work situation gave rise to questions of leadership and how this is practised.

Therefore, in the present study the aim was to gain a deeper understanding of how nursing schools in New York head perceive their leadership in developing school health care and school nurses work.

Posted in NY / New York | Tagged | Leave a comment

nursing schools in north carolina


Nursing schools in north carolina

In 2005, the North Carolina General Assembly established the school-based CFST to facilitate service access for children at risk of school failure or out-of-home placement. Beginning in 2005-2006, state funds have supported 1 certified school nurse and 1 licensed nursing schools in north carolina social worker in each of 101 schools with a large proportion of high-risk students across the state. These CFST leaders are funded to work full time on CFST. CFST leaders’ primary duty is to coordinate services for at-risk students among education, health, social service, and juvenile justice agencies. They engage with families who have been referred to the program, determine if a CFST is the appropriate resource for the family, schedule and facilitate team meetings with parents, service providers, and community partners, and manage cases, and monitor students’ progress. Child and Family Support Team Initiative leaders make home visits to meet the parents who lack transportation, to build trust among families who have disconnected from the school system, and to become familiar with the students’ home environment. In most schools, the nurse and social worker fully share responsibility for the majority of cases. In other schools, the nurse and social worker each assume the lead on cases based upon their relative expertise. In either instance, the nurse and social worker support one another throughout this intense process.

A key component of the CFST initiative is the involvement of multiple agencies, including the Departments of Public Instruction (DPI), the Administrative Office of the Courts, the Departments of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (DJJDP), Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health, Social Services (DSS), and Mental Health, Development Disabilities, and Substance Use (DMH/DD/SAS). Each agency was charged with working together through this program.

Program components of the CFST model include child and family team meetings, service plans, and a Web-based case management system. Each one is described below.

REFERRAL PROCESS

According to the CFST model, any school faculty or staff member may refer a student to the CFST nurse or social worker for any of the following reasons: academic factors (eg, retained 1 or more years, failed 2 or more classes in a recent semester, sudden drop in grades), excessive absences (eg, excessive tardiness, skips class, leaves early, suspensions), or “inappropriate social interactions” (eg, aggressive or inappropriate behavior, delinquent activities, victim of bullying, withdrawn/change in behavior), and health and human service needs (eg, health and/or mental health concerns, developmental issues, suspected substance use, pregnant/parenting or income related).

Once a CFST leader receives a referral, he or she assesses the student’s needs by meeting the parents and gathering information from those who best know the student (including conversations with the student). Nurses and social workers also periodically visit youths’ homes to learn more about family situations and introduce themselves to families. They then schedule a meeting with the student’s parent or guardian and other adults who have invested in the child’s success (such as ministers and coaches), the student (if sufficiently mature), and representatives of any health and social service organizations believed to be relevant to the child’s needs.

CHILD AND FAMILY TEAM MEETINGS

Meetings are held at a time that the family can attendoften evenings or weekends. A primary objective of the initial meeting is to establish goals for the child that build on child and family strengths and a strategy to achieve those goals, including a plan for all necessary health and social services. Instead of having separate case plans with each agency, the child and his or her family should have a single plan integrating all service providers, a goal summarized as “1 child, 1 family, 1 plan.” The agency relevant to the student’s primary unmet need is charged with leading the CFST (eg, school staff lead for academic issues, a behavioral health provider leads for behavioral health problems, or social services lead when the primary unmet need relates to child abuse or neglect). Through subsequent meetings, the group monitors progress and adjusts plans as the child’s situation changes.

Research has linked interagency teams to additional receipt of services for children in child welfare as well as sometimes decreased recidivism rates.9 When a United Kingdom social services department used a form of child and family teams in 16 schools, parents and students were satisfied with the program and attendance and behavior improved.10

CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Nurses and social workers enter data on students referred by the CFST program via a Web-based case management system. The information includes student demographics (age, race, ethnicity, gender, grade, special education status), academic, health, and social service needs, team meetings, services plans, follow-up on service plans, and reasons why cases close. These data are used in several ways. First, CFST leaders can track students’ needs and ensure receipt of services. Second, aggregate reports allow CFST staff to examine trends in their schools that may inform decisions about where to make additional investments in services. Third, state officials use this information to monitor the program and model fidelity. Finally, the evaluation team at the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University is using data from the case management system to assess program impact on academic outcomes by comparing children served through CFSTs to children in comparable schools who have not been served through CFSTs.

PROFILE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVED

During the first 2 years of the program (the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 academic years), 15,680 students were referred to the program and entered into the case management system, of whom 13,902 (89%) had information on needs listed.

About half of the students in the system were in elementary school, 27% were in middle school, and 24% were in high school. Boys made up 54% of those referred. The racial and ethnic composition of the students referred to the CFST program roughly matches the composition of the schools. For example, 53% of children referred to the CFST program were African-American relative to 53% of the student body in CFST schools. Similarly, Latinos represented 11% of the students referred to the CFST program and constitute 12% of the school body. American Indians represented 3% of CFST referrals and 3% of overall school population.

Of the students referred, 73% had an academic problem, 56% a health problem, 49% a mental health, substance use, or developmental need, 65% a social service need, and 6% a legal need. As shown in Figure 1, 77% of students served by CFST had needs that related to more than one sector. One third (31%) had 2 needs, 22% had 3 needs, another 21% had 4 needs, and 3% had 5 needs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP

North Carolina’s CFST Initiative shows how schools can facilitate access to the health and human services that the vulnerable children need for stability and success. To help students achieve academically, CFST leaders connect students and families to resources such as tutoring, mentoring, counseling, eye glasses, hearing devices, food stamps, housing support, and after-school activities. The nurses and social workers help families initiate behavioral health care for issues such as depression, anxiety, or dealing with family events such as death or illness. They also help families address barriers to receiving services such as lack of transportation. For example, in some school systems the CFST leaders can drive students to services. In other communities, nurses and social workers host meetings in locations easily accessible for families such as churches or community centers.

Of course new models always encounter new challenges. Because some nursing schools in north carolina districts are in very rural counties and nurses could earn higher salaries in other jobs, recruiting qualified nurses has been challenging in a few locations. During the early stages of implementation, a few principals were wary of nurses and social workers leaving school grounds to make home visits and of offering the compensatory time necessary for scheduling evening, early morning, or weekend meetings.

Another challenge has been clarifying and communicating the difference between a CFST nurse and a traditional school nurse in north carolina. In the CFST program, both nurses and social workers address a range of issues affecting academic performance, potentially including family health, social service, and material needs. Unlike most traditional school nurses, CFST nurses serve the population of only 1 school, and address students’ needs beyond those pertaining to physical health concerns. If the school had a nurse prior to the CFST initiative, CFST funds could not supplant dollars used for this nurse’s salary. Yet, CFST nurses in some schools still routinely receive referrals of children with the types of isolated physical maladies best handled by traditional nurses. Although some nurses have reported significant difficulty communicating the nature of their CFST role to colleagues and parents, many have noted satisfaction from developing deeper and more enduring involvement with families.

At the same time, having a nurse work with a social worker has presented some unexpected opportunities. For instance, when a CFST nurse and social worker visit a home, often the nurse will knock on the door. Experience has shown that families are much less wary of nurses than of social workers, whom they associate with child welfare.

When children’s needs are unmet, nursing schools in north carolina are often the first to identify potential problems. North Carolina’s school-based CFST initiative allows schools to create coordinated health care plans so that every student receives the support she/he needs to achieve academic success.

GRAPH: Figure 1. Students Served by the CFST Program in 2006-2007 and 2007-2008: Number of Sectors That Their Needs Cross Source: Authors’ tabulation of the NC School-Based CFST case management data.

 

Posted in CA / California | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Nursing schools in Houston

Nursing schools in Houston

Nursing schools in houston

Nursing schools in houston

Nursing schools in houston construction, negotiation and implementation of local goals The head nursing schools in Houston specific position was experienced as a pioneering job, working alone and in isolation, but also with some autonomy in interpreting school health care, and some freedom in creating theirown goals for school health care, given some setframeworks and financial restrictions.When I started five years ago, there was nothing, absolutely nothing. There was no handbook, no common guidelines.They described their situation as having someautonomy in implementing their own goals in a vaguecontext but being dependent on the organizationalleaders and the financial situation for real implementation. However, this situation provided some spaceand freedom to interpret and implement goals towardstheir own visions, and to construct and develop methods and routines in school health work.A central feature in almost all interviews was thedifficulty, but also the need, to find methods and routines for developing school health care. Developingquality work in school health care was important andregarded as a priority area. The introduction of computerized journals and programmes was seen in severalinterviews as part of this priority work. The school nurses broad competence was felt to be a basis fordeveloping the students work environment, and wasalso seen as a possible subject to profile the work of nursing schools in houston. Local negotiations and being a link between school nurses and decision makers was seen as an importantpart of the role. The head school nurses described theimportance of justifying the school nurses as well astheir own profession and role. To legitimize the school nurses and their own work, the head school nurses provided the organizational leaders with information.Providing statistical information about local schoolhealth care to political and organizational leaders, aswell as being available on different occasions, werestrategies for visualizing and enhancing the importanceof the school nurses work. Being present in differentsituations was reported as a priority strategy for visualizing and profiling school health care in the municipalities.Meeting nursing schools in Houston expectations of supportive leadership Availability to school children as well as parents andteachers was seen as a demand, as well as a factor onwhich to base the legitimacy of school nurses work atlocal schools. However, working in isolation from colleagues at the same time as demands of constantavailability could be a limitation for developing school nurses work. A good relationship among the school nurses in, as well as continuing education based on theschool nurses own requirements and wishes, was seenas a priority strategy for strengthening the school nurses profession. Therefore, and sometimes in conflictwith the head teachers, the head school nurses regularlyarranged priority meetings as well as education andtraining for nursing schools in Houston in the municipality.

To strengthen the nursing schools in houston lone workingsituation, the participants stressed the importance ofgiving individual support to school nurses. The supportcould involve being available, being expected to provide practical service to school nurses, visiting schoolsand counselling nursing schools in houston at difficult situations.Sometimes these practical tasks were described as taking too large a part of the head of nursing schools in Houston, which had an impact on developing their profession forthe future.

Posted in houston / TX | Tagged , | Leave a comment